Honeywell builds the world’s most powerful quantum computer
When it comes to quantum computers, there’s a tendency to think of companies like Google and IBM as big companies in the field, but competition can soon be fierce. Honeywell said one day it will unveil a quantum computer that is at least twice as powerful as the current device in the next three months.
It takes a bit of context to subdivide that claim. As the protocol points out, most companies talk about qubits when talking about the capabilities of computers. For example, Sycamore, a computer that claimed to have achieved a quantum advantage last year, had 53 cubits. Honeywell instead uses metrics called quantum quantities to describe the machine’s function. IBM invented this term and here is how to define it.
Quantum Volume takes into account the number of qubits, connection, and gate and measurement errors circuit compiler All improvements as long as it progresses at a similar speed, Quantum Volume.”
The important thing to understand
The important thing here is that you want to measure the performance of your computer by grasping different parts of the quantum volume as a whole. Raw cubits are important for computation, but the way they interact with each other is also important. For example, the lower the error rate that a qubit produces, the higher the score
Honeywell claimed that the upcoming computer’s quantum volume was over 64. IBM recently announced a 28-qubit computer that built this quantity in 32 quarters. This is thanks to an innovation in 2015 that developed a technique for capturing electrically charged atoms in a superimposed state using a laser.
As exciting as Honeywell’s work, it’s best not to get too excited until the company properly describes the computer. Last year, Google announced that it had achieved quantum superiority, causing conflicting hype and controversy. In particular, IBM said the company was “irresponsible” based on the fact that Google built Sycamore to solve one specific equation.
That said, most other companies are at least optimistic about what Honeywell managed. For example, IBM’s research team said in a protocol, “Honeywell’s paper shows a new advance in programmable trapped ion quantum systems.” The company also gained Microsoft approval by announcing a partnership to allow Azure clients to access Honeywell’s quantum computers.
“Top secret of quantum computers.” Ilia’s Khan, CEO of Cambridge Quantum Computing (CQC), called Honeywell’s efforts to build the world’s most powerful quantum computer. In a game where most major players are competing for attention, Honeywell has been trying quietly over the past few years (according to strict NDA). However, the company has made a breakthrough in the next three months to launch the world’s most powerful quantum computer.
Honeywell also announced that it has made strategic investments in CQC and Zapata Computing, focusing on the software side of quantum computing. The company also partnered with JP Morgan Chase to develop a quantum algorithm using Honeywell’s quantum computers. The company also recently announced an alliance with Microsoft.
Honeywell has long built complex control systems that power the world’s largest industrial sites. It is thanks to that kind of experience that it is now possible to create an advanced ion trap that is at the heart of the effort.
The company claims in the paper accompanying the announcement that this ion trap could achieve a much longer decoherence time than its competitors.
“It starts with the legacy Honeywell had to work on,” said Tony Utley, president of Honeywell Quantum Solutions. “And we had solutions related to the integration of complex control systems because of our business in the aerospace and defense, oil and gas, and chemical and materials industries, which gave us everything that underlies quantum computing. It’s very different from computing, it needs ultra-fast vacuum system function, it needs cryogenic function, it needs precision control, it needs laser and optical function, it needs magnetism and vibration stability, and we have our own foundry So it was literally possible to design a computer system configuration from a trap.”